<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Refinancing Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bryanallott.net/blog/2009/05/refinancing-model.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bryanallott.net/blog/2009/05/refinancing-model.html</link>
	<description>shifting complexity one bit at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:38:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryanallott.net &#187; Morty py</title>
		<link>http://bryanallott.net/blog/2009/05/refinancing-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>bryanallott.net &#187; Morty py</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanallott.net/blog/?p=228#comment-288</guid>
		<description>[...] same Morty that was built using Ruby on Rails as part of a bigger scheme related to the basics of financial learning, specifically the concept of amortisation. Morty py, as it&#8217;s creative name suggests, is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] same Morty that was built using Ruby on Rails as part of a bigger scheme related to the basics of financial learning, specifically the concept of amortisation. Morty py, as it&#8217;s creative name suggests, is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://bryanallott.net/blog/2009/05/refinancing-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanallott.net/blog/?p=228#comment-267</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bondbusters.co.za&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bondbusters&lt;/a&gt; has just released an article on the topic:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bondbusters.co.za/pressArchive/default.php?news=91&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Debt Consolidation alternatives - what&#039;s best for you?&lt;/a&gt;

Hopefully by combining the numbers above here, what they have to say might make some sense now, in particular:
&lt;cite&gt;...but because you have carried your short term debt into the long term you will inevitably end up paying back a larger amount of money over the longer course of the repayment term.&lt;/cite&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bondbusters.co.za" rel="nofollow">Bondbusters</a> has just released an article on the topic:<br />
<a href="http://www.bondbusters.co.za/pressArchive/default.php?news=91" rel="nofollow">The Debt Consolidation alternatives &#8211; what&#8217;s best for you?</a></p>
<p>Hopefully by combining the numbers above here, what they have to say might make some sense now, in particular:<br />
<cite>&#8230;but because you have carried your short term debt into the long term you will inevitably end up paying back a larger amount of money over the longer course of the repayment term.</cite></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://bryanallott.net/blog/2009/05/refinancing-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanallott.net/blog/?p=228#comment-264</guid>
		<description>and to be fair, if you&#039;re in a jam, that extra 300K over the long term really represents what you&#039;re prepared to pay to not lose the ground (or assets) you&#039;ve covered thus far. so if 300k smoothed out over the next 20 years is a fair price to keep the house and car, then it&#039;s really not such a bad &#039;loss&#039;. 

the alternative, in a jam, would be losing either one (or both) and then having to rent for a while and then to try again. _that_ option, could easily be worth a lot more than 300k.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and to be fair, if you&#8217;re in a jam, that extra 300K over the long term really represents what you&#8217;re prepared to pay to not lose the ground (or assets) you&#8217;ve covered thus far. so if 300k smoothed out over the next 20 years is a fair price to keep the house and car, then it&#8217;s really not such a bad &#8216;loss&#8217;. </p>
<p>the alternative, in a jam, would be losing either one (or both) and then having to rent for a while and then to try again. _that_ option, could easily be worth a lot more than 300k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
